Jennifer Loeb and Nigel Kent recently received reasons for judgment in Corbould v. BCAA Insurance Corporation, 2010 BCSC 1536, a claim for insurance coverage related to a furnace fuel spill that damaged the plaintiff’s recreational home. In dismissing the lawsuit with costs, the Court adopted wholesale the defendant’s arguments concerning policy interpretation, the doctrine of reasonable expectations and the pollution exclusion. The link to the case is http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/10/15/2010BCSC1536.htm.
Related Content
WEBCAST | COVID-19 Employment Concerns for Businesses
Andrea Raso, Chair of our Employment & Labour Group, answers some of the most pressing questions and concerns businesses may have during the COVID-19 pandemic. ... Continued
CRT confirms its jurisdiction to consider the Human Rights Code and whether an enactment has a discriminatory effect
There had been some uncertainty as to the Civil Resolution Tribunal’s jurisdiction over matters relating to human rights issues because the Civil Resolution Tribunal Act ... Continued
Private Equity and Cautious Optimism
Lexpert article quoted a statistic that by September 30, 2014, investors had disclosed transactions to a value of more than twice that of the entirety of 2013.