Clark Wilson’s Insurance Group to present at P&C Insurance Seminar
Nigel Kent, Valerie Dixon, Jennifer Loeb and Raman Johal from Clark Wilson’s Insurance Group will be presenting at an Insurance Institute of BC seminar. The ... Continued
Our expertise helps our clients understand how the law affects their business
Nigel Kent, Valerie Dixon, Jennifer Loeb and Raman Johal from Clark Wilson’s Insurance Group will be presenting at an Insurance Institute of BC seminar. The ... Continued
Updated November 2012 In 2003, a lawyer’s negligence case involving a missed limitation period resulted in a Supreme Court of Canada decision declaring that BC’s ... Continued
Comparison between BC’s WESA (coming into force) and the Alberta Wills and Succession Act.
Discussion on potential reasons that one should have a will (pre-WESA).
In 2011, the Health Care (Consent) and Care Facility (Admission) Act (the “Act”) was amended to provide adults with the opportunity to plan for their ... Continued
As referenced in our earlier article, Avoiding Wills Variation Claims: How Far is Too Far?, the Wills Variation Act (“WVA”) permits spouses or children of ... Continued
In a previous post, we reported on a Federal Court of Canada decision, upholding the decision of the Registrar of Trademarks to refuse registration of the mark TEACHERS ... Continued
Most employers know that it is not easy to fire or discipline an employee for just cause, especially if the reasons are due to performance ... Continued
Bill C-13, Keeping Canada’s Economy and Jobs Growing Act, has now received Royal Assent by Parliament. This omnibus legislation implements amendments to various acts, including ... Continued
In the recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Wahgoshig First Nation v. Ontario, 2011 ONSC 7708, Solid Gold Resources Corp. (Solid Gold), ... Continued
On December 2, 2011, the B.C. Supreme Court granted an interim injunction restraining Taseko Mines Limited (Taseko) from continuing exploratory work under two provincial permits, ... Continued
Court considered what constitutes “use” in two cases